On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 13:37:54 GMT, Fei Gao wrote:
>> This patch enables BTI branch protection for runtime part on Linux/aarch64
>> platform.
>>
>> Motivation
>>
>> 1. Since Fedora 33, glibc+kernel are PAC/BTI enabled by default. User-level
>> packages can gain additional hardening by compiling
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 01:41:16 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
> Compile the JDK as C++17, enabling the use of all C++17 language features
This pull request has been closed without being integrated.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14988
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 14:30:28 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky wrote:
> Some of bundles may not get removed. This is follows
> [JDK-8336928](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8336928). Problem does not
> always show up, so I have not seen it in my test runs, but since then I have
> seen some GHA runs af
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 14:30:28 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky wrote:
> Some of bundles may not get removed. This is follows
> [JDK-8336928](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8336928). Problem does not
> always show up, so I have not seen it in my test runs, but since then I have
> seen some GHA runs af
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 14:46:42 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Some of bundles may not get removed. This is follows
>> [JDK-8336928](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8336928). Problem does not
>> always show up, so I have not seen it in my test runs, but since then I have
>> seen some GHA r
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 14:30:28 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky wrote:
> Some of bundles may not get removed. This is follows
> [JDK-8336928](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8336928). Problem does not
> always show up, so I have not seen it in my test runs, but since then I have
> seen some GHA runs af
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 09:59:07 GMT, George Adams wrote:
>> Adds Alpine build CI job to the GitHub actions matrix. Currently this only
>> builds hotspot. I can add tests too if people think that would be useful but
>> for now I've left it as just build.
>
> George Adams has updated the pull reques
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 14:30:28 GMT, Zdenek Zambersky wrote:
> Some of bundles may not get removed. This is follows
> [JDK-8336928](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8336928). Problem does not
> always show up, so I have not seen it in my test runs, but since then I have
> seen some GHA runs af
Some of bundles may not get removed. This is follows
[JDK-8336928](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8336928). Problem does not
always show up, so I have not seen it in my test runs, but since then I have
seen some GHA runs affected by this.
**Details:**
Turns out, that call to list artifacts
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 13:01:09 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> After [JDK-8333189](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333189) I get now
>> this build error (when using clang on Linux) :
>> `clang: error: invalid linker name in argument '-fuse-ld=lld'`
>> We should better check for lld in the co
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 13:01:09 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> After [JDK-8333189](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333189) I get now
>> this build error (when using clang on Linux) :
>> `clang: error: invalid linker name in argument '-fuse-ld=lld'`
>> We should better check for lld in the co
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:49:27 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> After [JDK-8333189](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333189) I get now
> this build error (when using clang on Linux) :
> `clang: error: invalid linker name in argument '-fuse-ld=lld'`
> We should better check for lld in the config
> After [JDK-8333189](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333189) I get now
> this build error (when using clang on Linux) :
> `clang: error: invalid linker name in argument '-fuse-ld=lld'`
> We should better check for lld in the configure process if it is required
> with clang .
Matthias Baes
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 09:35:41 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> As planned in [JDK-8338285](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338285), we
> are about to deprecate the port for removal. It makes little sense to
> continue testing the port, and thus block development and integration of new
> feat
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:49:27 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> After [JDK-8333189](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333189) I get now
> this build error (when using clang on Linux) :
> `clang: error: invalid linker name in argument '-fuse-ld=lld'`
> We should better check for lld in the config
After [JDK-8333189](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333189) I get now this
build error (when using clang on Linux) :
`clang: error: invalid linker name in argument '-fuse-ld=lld'`
We should better check for lld in the configure process if it is required with
clang .
-
Commit m
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 22:51:44 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> I was not very fond of adding x86 testing to GHA either. :-) I will not enter
> the fight if that should be removed. (But my personal opinion is that it
> makes a whole lot more sense to test on a 32-bit architecture than just a
> d
> Adds Alpine build CI job to the GitHub actions matrix. Currently this only
> builds hotspot. I can add tests too if people think that would be useful but
> for now I've left it as just build.
George Adams has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last rev
> Adds Alpine build CI job to the GitHub actions matrix. Currently this only
> builds hotspot. I can add tests too if people think that would be useful but
> for now I've left it as just build.
George Adams has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last rev
> Adds Alpine build CI job to the GitHub actions matrix. Currently this only
> builds hotspot. I can add tests too if people think that would be useful but
> for now I've left it as just build.
George Adams has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last rev
> Adds Alpine build CI job to the GitHub actions matrix. Currently this only
> builds hotspot. I can add tests too if people think that would be useful but
> for now I've left it as just build.
George Adams has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last rev
> Adds Alpine build CI job to the GitHub actions matrix. Currently this only
> builds hotspot. I can add tests too if people think that would be useful but
> for now I've left it as just build.
George Adams has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last rev
> Adds Alpine build CI job to the GitHub actions matrix. Currently this only
> builds hotspot. I can add tests too if people think that would be useful but
> for now I've left it as just build.
George Adams has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last rev
Adds Alpine build CI job to the GitHub actions matrix. Currently this only
builds hotspot. I can add tests too if people think that would be useful but
for now I've left it as just build.
-
Commit messages:
- fix test bundle
- add make-target: 'hotspot'
- 8282944: GHA: Add Alpine
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 09:35:41 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> As planned in [JDK-8338285](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338285), we
> are about to deprecate the port for removal. It makes little sense to
> continue testing the port, and thus block development and integration of new
> feat
25 matches
Mail list logo
