Hi Çağla,
you want the build-dev mailing list for that kind of questions.
Forwarded there. You can subscribe via
https://mail.openjdk.org/mailman/listinfo/build-dev
Short answer is that there is no support for emscripten yet. If that's
something you'd like to add, then build-dev is the right
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 10:26:17 GMT, George Adams wrote:
>> Adds Alpine build CI job to the GitHub actions matrix. Currently this only
>> builds hotspot. I can add tests too if people think that would be useful but
>> for now I've left it as just build.
>
> George Adams has updated the pull reques
> Adds Alpine build CI job to the GitHub actions matrix. Currently this only
> builds hotspot. I can add tests too if people think that would be useful but
> for now I've left it as just build.
George Adams has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last rev
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 15:44:18 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Honestly, I am ambivalent about this. This only captures the Hotspot build
> errors, which I think are rare for Alpine, judging by looking around the JBS.
> And it makes sense: the build failures looks basically around compiling
> aga
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 10:26:17 GMT, George Adams wrote:
>> Adds Alpine build CI job to the GitHub actions matrix. Currently this only
>> builds hotspot. I can add tests too if people think that would be useful but
>> for now I've left it as just build.
>
> George Adams has updated the pull reques
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 02:26:10 GMT, Eric Liu wrote:
>> Fei Gao has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
>> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought
>> in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional commits
>> since t
> This patch enables BTI branch protection for runtime part on Linux/aarch64
> platform.
>
> Motivation
>
> 1. Since Fedora 33, glibc+kernel are PAC/BTI enabled by default. User-level
> packages can gain additional hardening by compiling with the GCC/Clang flag
> `-mbranch-protection=flag`. Se
On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 10:26:17 GMT, George Adams wrote:
>> Adds Alpine build CI job to the GitHub actions matrix. Currently this only
>> builds hotspot. I can add tests too if people think that would be useful but
>> for now I've left it as just build.
>
> George Adams has updated the pull reques
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 14:53:02 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> The big question, as always with GHA, is if there is enough interest from the
> community to warrant adding this configuration to GHA. GHA testing is done on
> the developer's individual account's quota. It takes time and resources,
> Adds Alpine build CI job to the GitHub actions matrix. Currently this only
> builds hotspot. I can add tests too if people think that would be useful but
> for now I've left it as just build.
George Adams has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge
or a rebase. The pull
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 09:35:41 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> As planned in [JDK-8338285](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338285), we
> are about to deprecate the port for removal. It makes little sense to
> continue testing the port, and thus block development and integration of new
> feat
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 09:35:41 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> As planned in [JDK-8338285](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338285), we
> are about to deprecate the port for removal. It makes little sense to
> continue testing the port, and thus block development and integration of new
> feat
On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 09:35:41 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> As planned in [JDK-8338285](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8338285), we
> are about to deprecate the port for removal. It makes little sense to
> continue testing the port, and thus block development and integration of new
> feat
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 10:49:27 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
> After [JDK-8333189](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333189) I get now
> this build error (when using clang on Linux) :
> `clang: error: invalid linker name in argument '-fuse-ld=lld'`
> We should better check for lld in the config
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 13:01:09 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote:
>> After [JDK-8333189](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8333189) I get now
>> this build error (when using clang on Linux) :
>> `clang: error: invalid linker name in argument '-fuse-ld=lld'`
>> We should better check for lld in the co
15 matches
Mail list logo