On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:20:52 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> I have noticed that GHA jobs started to fail when creating ppc64el sysroot.
> We are using Debian bullseye as the base for sysroots. Debian bullseye is LTS
> release. Perhaps counter-intuitively, LTS platform support shrinks over the
On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 06:50:47 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> This PR proposes to improve handling of javac's `Flags` in two ways:
>> - for each flag, there's now an informational annotation specifying what is
>> the target Symbol type. Only targets right now are `TypeSymbol`s,
>> `MethodSymbol`s and
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 14:38:18 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Fixing toString value for flags that have ACC_ overloaded flags.
>> - Review feedback: marking ACC flags wit
On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:36:16 GMT, Fei Gao wrote:
>> @fg1417 -- want to pull it to `jdk25u`? I think it is not a showstopper for
>> JDK 25 GA, so we can get it into `25.0.1`.
>
> @shipilev thanks for your reminder! I'll backport it to` jdk25u` soon.
> Hello @fg1417, we see build failures in our
On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:40:18 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which backs out the changes done in
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8363063? The linux-aarch64 builds in our
> CI started failing after the changes in JDK-8363063 were integrated.
>
> The de
On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:46:32 GMT, Albert Mingkun Yang wrote:
>> Can I please get a review of this change which backs out the changes done in
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8363063? The linux-aarch64 builds in our
>> CI started failing after the changes in JDK-8363063 were integrated.
>
Can I please get a review of this change which backs out the changes done in
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8363063? The linux-aarch64 builds in our CI
started failing after the changes in JDK-8363063 were integrated.
The description in the backout issue
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JD
On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:40:18 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which backs out the changes done in
> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8363063? The linux-aarch64 builds in our
> CI started failing after the changes in JDK-8363063 were integrated.
>
> The de
On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:36:16 GMT, Fei Gao wrote:
>> @fg1417 -- want to pull it to `jdk25u`? I think it is not a showstopper for
>> JDK 25 GA, so we can get it into `25.0.1`.
>
> @shipilev thanks for your reminder! I'll backport it to` jdk25u` soon.
Hello @fg1417, we see build failures in our CI
On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 09:41:28 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Thanks for your approval @theRealAph @shipilev !
>
> @fg1417 -- want to pull it to `jdk25u`? I think it is not a showstopper for
> JDK 25 GA, so we can get it into `25.0.1`.
@shipilev thanks for your reminder! I'll backport it to` jdk
After [JDK-8329004](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329004), the following
code was added.
#ifndef PNG_LOONGARCH_LSX_OPT
# if defined(__loongarch_sx)
# define PNG_LOONGARCH_LSX_OPT 1
# else
# define PNG_LOONGARCH_LSX_OPT 0
# endif
#endif
Some compilers on LoongArch64 platforms enable `__l
On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 08:43:25 GMT, Fei Gao wrote:
>> Marked as reviewed by aph (Reviewer).
>
> Thanks for your approval @theRealAph @shipilev !
@fg1417 -- want to pull it to `jdk25u`? I think it is not a showstopper for JDK
25 GA, so we can get it into `25.0.1`.
-
PR Comment: https
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 08:12:51 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> Thanks! More reviews, please?
Ping :)
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26447#issuecomment-3126292006
On Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:20:52 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> I have noticed that GHA jobs started to fail when creating ppc64el sysroot.
> We are using Debian bullseye as the base for sysroots. Debian bullseye is LTS
> release. Perhaps counter-intuitively, LTS platform support shrinks over the
On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 08:09:45 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> This patch fixes a typo introduced in
>> [JDK-8353217](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/130b0cdaa6604da47a893e5425547acf3d5253f4),
>> which incorrectly disabled SVE vector math symbols. As a result, some
>> vector math test cases su
On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 16:02:41 GMT, Fei Gao wrote:
> This patch fixes a typo introduced in
> [JDK-8353217](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/130b0cdaa6604da47a893e5425547acf3d5253f4),
> which incorrectly disabled SVE vector math symbols. As a result, some vector
> math test cases such as `jd
16 matches
Mail list logo
