On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 18:59:45 GMT, Jesse Glick wrote:
> @jaikiran in
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12871#issuecomment-1612310113 pointed me
> to a resource I had not previously found. https://openjdk.org/contribute is
> fine at a high level but still says things like
>
ge to the appropriate development
>> list…
>
> which clearly predates Skara, and does not apparently link to anything more
> current. Whereas this
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/doc/building.md is thorough and
> discoverable, finding accurate guidelines for proposin
ge to the appropriate development
>> list…
>
> which clearly predates Skara, and does not apparently link to anything more
> current. Whereas this
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/doc/building.md is thorough and
> discoverable, finding accurate guidelines for proposin
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 13:51:16 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Different versions of pandoc will create different output. The version we
>> currently use is defined in `make/devkit/createPandocBundle.sh`. If you are
>> unable to use this version, I can generate the file for you.
>
> I did just that,
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 12:17:14 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Jesse Glick has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four addi
ge to the appropriate development
>> list…
>
> which clearly predates Skara, and does not apparently link to anything more
> current. Whereas this
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/doc/building.md is thorough and
> discoverable, finding accurate guidelines for proposin
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 12:18:08 GMT, Jesse Glick wrote:
>> @jaikiran in
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12871#issuecomment-1612310113 pointed me
>> to a resource I had not previously found. https://openjdk.org/contribute is
>> fine at a high level but still says
ge to the appropriate development
>> list…
>
> which clearly predates Skara, and does not apparently link to anything more
> current. Whereas this
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/doc/building.md is thorough and
> discoverable, finding accurate guidelines for proposin
On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 12:58:15 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> It would be better to update the text on openjdk.org to reflect the current
> practice and processes.
In that case shall I close this PR, and someone with permission to do so could
reword JDK-8312882 to that effect?
-
PR
On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 18:59:45 GMT, Jesse Glick wrote:
> @jaikiran in
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12871#issuecomment-1612310113 pointed me
> to a resource I had not previously found. https://openjdk.org/contribute is
> fine at a high level but still says things like
>
@jaikiran in https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12871#issuecomment-1612310113
pointed me to a resource I had not previously found.
https://openjdk.org/contribute is fine at a high level but still says things
like
> When your change is ready, send a message to the appropriate development list…
11 matches
Mail list logo
