On 2024-05-21 20:51, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
Magnus will send out his changes as PR draft for initial review for
deciding on how to move forward with the non-makefile changes.
This is now published in https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/19478.
/Magnus
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 9:09 AM Magnus Ihse Bursie <
magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 2024-05-07 06:04, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
>
> I did think I correctly changed every dynamic check that you had added
> to a compile-time check, so it bewilders me somewhat when you say that
> jvm.cfg is not
On 2024-05-07 06:04, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
I did think I correctly changed every dynamic check that you had added
to a compile-time check, so it bewilders me somewhat when you say that
jvm.cfg is not needed in your branch.
Can you verify and confirm that the static launcher actually works in
your
We had a discussion on static Java this morning. Outcome of today's
discussion:
For the first step in earlier outlined steps, there's a preference to have
a minimum buildable and runnable (be able to run HelloWorld) `javastatic`
as the initial integration point for the mainline. Following are the
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 5:26 AM Magnus Ihse Bursie <
magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 2024-05-07 06:04, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 5:42 AM Magnus Ihse
> Bursie wrote:
>
> I am not sure why clang insisted on picking up ld and not lld. I remeber
> trying with -fuse-ld
On 2024-05-07 06:04, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 5:42 AM Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
I am not sure why clang insisted on picking up ld and not lld. I remeber
trying with -fuse-ld=lld, and that it did not work either.
Unfortunately, I don't remember exactly what the problems were
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 5:42 AM Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
>
>
> On 2024-04-26 03:15, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 9:28 AM Magnus Ihse Bursie
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Just to be more clear, that's with using `objcopy` to localize
> >> non-exported symbols for all JDK static librari
On 2024-04-26 03:15, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 9:28 AM Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
Just to be more clear, that's with using `objcopy` to localize non-exported
symbols for all JDK static libraries and libjvm.a, not just libjvm.a right?
Yes.
Can you please include the compi
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 9:28 AM Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
>
>
> Just to be more clear, that's with using `objcopy` to localize non-exported
> symbols for all JDK static libraries and libjvm.a, not just libjvm.a right?
>
> Yes.
>
>
> Can you please include the compiler or linker errors on linux/cl
Just to be more clear, that's with using `objcopy` to localize
non-exported symbols for all JDK static libraries and libjvm.a, not
just libjvm.a right?
Yes.
Can you please include the compiler or linker errors on linux/clang?
It is a bit tricky. The problem arises at the partial linking st
Magnus, thanks for the update! Looks like you've made some good progress.
Please see my comments below.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 3:42 AM Magnus Ihse Bursie <
magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com> wrote:
> I will not be able to participate in the meeting today.
>
> Let me report a bit on my work this week
I will not be able to participate in the meeting today.
Let me report a bit on my work this week.
I have made a proof of concept branch which can properly compile static
java on macos with clang and linux with gcc. (With "properly" I mean
hiding non-exported symbols). I still have problems rep
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 12:39 PM Jiangli Zhou wrote:
>
> Magnus, thanks for the meeting summary! Please see clarifications
> below, to avoid any confusion.
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:27 AM Magnus Ihse Bursie
> wrote:
> >
> > This is my summary of what was said in today's meeting:
> >
> > * Ji
Magnus, thanks for the meeting summary! Please see clarifications
below, to avoid any confusion.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:27 AM Magnus Ihse Bursie
wrote:
>
> This is my summary of what was said in today's meeting:
>
> * Jiangli reported that her team had done extensive testing and not seen
> an
This is my summary of what was said in today's meeting:
* Jiangli reported that her team had done extensive testing and not seen
any problems, both with just the static launcher as generated by the
leyden branch, and with bundled user applications using the One Jar (?)
tool. They tested JDK ti
15 matches
Mail list logo
