On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 16:44:28 GMT, Markus Grönlund wrote:
>> A question about "level". Is the intention that the value can be anything,
>> e.g. some new event next month might use the values "1", "2, "3"? Just
>> asking because ordinarily deprecated vs. terminally deprecated is very
>> specific
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 16:44:28 GMT, Markus Grönlund wrote:
>> A question about "level". Is the intention that the value can be anything,
>> e.g. some new event next month might use the values "1", "2, "3"? Just
>> asking because ordinarily deprecated vs. terminally deprecated is very
>> specific
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 16:33:48 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
> A question about "level". Is the intention that the value can be anything,
> e.g. some new event next month might use the values "1", "2, "3"? Just asking
> because ordinarily deprecated vs. terminally deprecated is very specific to
> the
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 16:31:13 GMT, Markus Grönlund wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> please help review this enhancement to add a JFR event to report runtime
>> invocations of methods that have been declared deprecated in the JDK.
>>
>> Testing: jdk_jfr, CI 1-6, stress testing
>>
>> Thanks
>> Markus
