On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:53:10 GMT, Harold Seigel wrote:
>> Please review this fix for JDK-8285792. The fix removes print statements
>> from check_signal_handler() so that it doesn't print all the handlers every
>> time it finds one that is modified. Instead, it returns true if the handler
>>
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:53:10 GMT, Harold Seigel wrote:
>> Please review this fix for JDK-8285792. The fix removes print statements
>> from check_signal_handler() so that it doesn't print all the handlers every
>> time it finds one that is modified. Instead, it returns true if the handler
>>
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:53:10 GMT, Harold Seigel wrote:
>> Please review this fix for JDK-8285792. The fix removes print statements
>> from check_signal_handler() so that it doesn't print all the handlers every
>> time it finds one that is modified. Instead, it returns true if the handler
>>
> Please review this fix for JDK-8285792. The fix removes print statements
> from check_signal_handler() so that it doesn't print all the handlers every
> time it finds one that is modified. Instead, it returns true if the handler
> is modified, false otherwise. Its caller, user_handler(), th
