On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 14:28:02 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
> Please review this PR that removes the remains of old fdTable-based socket
> close synchronization.
>
> Verified that tier1-3 tests continue to pass on Linux, MacOS and Windows. Did
> not verify AIX.
>
> Also removed one slow test for
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:08:07 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
>> src/java.base/unix/native/libnet/net_util_md.c line 703:
>>
>>> 701:
>>> 702: errno = 0;
>>> 703: read_rv = poll(&pfd, 1, nanoTimeout / NET_NSEC_PER_MSEC);
>>
>> I suspect this one will need to handle EINTR like the or
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 16:04:24 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> Please review this PR that removes the remains of old fdTable-based socket
>> close synchronization.
>>
>> Verified that tier1-3 tests continue to pass on Linux, MacOS and Windows.
>> Did not verify AIX.
>>
>> Also removed one slow test
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 14:28:02 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote:
> Please review this PR that removes the remains of old fdTable-based socket
> close synchronization.
>
> Verified that tier1-3 tests continue to pass on Linux, MacOS and Windows. Did
> not verify AIX.
>
> Also removed one slow test for
Please review this PR that removes the remains of old fdTable-based socket
close synchronization.
Verified that tier1-3 tests continue to pass on Linux, MacOS and Windows. Did
not verify AIX.
Also removed one slow test for an issue in fdtable implementation; as far as I
could tell, it is no lo
