On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 18:47:29 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> 8285093 introduced the new UTIL_ARG_WITH definition, which was not available
>> when both 8282948 and 8282700 were written. They can now be moved to using
>> the cleaner logic that UTIL_ARG_WITH grants.
>>
>> There are many more options
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 18:47:29 GMT, Julian Waters wrote:
>> 8285093 introduced the new UTIL_ARG_WITH definition, which was not available
>> when both 8282948 and 8282700 were written. They can now be moved to using
>> the cleaner logic that UTIL_ARG_WITH grants.
>>
>> There are many more options
> 8285093 introduced the new UTIL_ARG_WITH definition, which was not available
> when both 8282948 and 8282700 were written. They can now be moved to using
> the cleaner logic that UTIL_ARG_WITH grants.
>
> There are many more options that still use AC_ARG_WITH in jdk-version.m4.
> They are out
