Re: RFR: 8304986: Upcall stubs should support capureCallState

2023-04-24 Thread Jorn Vernee
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:25:32 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote: > Implement captureCallState support for upcall stubs. > > The method handle of an upcall stub linked with this linker option has an > additional leading memory segment parameter into which the capture state > (e.g. errno) should be

Re: RFR: 8304986: Upcall stubs should support capureCallState

2023-04-24 Thread ExE Boss
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:25:32 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote: > Implement captureCallState support for upcall stubs. > > The method handle of an upcall stub linked with this linker option has an > additional leading memory segment parameter into which the capture state > (e.g. errno) should be

Re: RFR: 8304986: Upcall stubs should support capureCallState

2023-04-24 Thread Jorn Vernee
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:25:32 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote: > Implement captureCallState support for upcall stubs. > > The method handle of an upcall stub linked with this linker option has an > additional leading memory segment parameter into which the capture state > (e.g. errno) should be

RFR: 8304986: Upcall stubs should support capureCallState

2023-04-24 Thread Jorn Vernee
Implement captureCallState support for upcall stubs. The method handle of an upcall stub linked with this linker option has an additional leading memory segment parameter into which the capture state (e.g. errno) should be written. After returning from Java, this value is then actually written