On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:14:58 GMT, Jiangli Zhou <jian...@openjdk.org> wrote:

> Please review this PR with a simple solution for resolving duplicate `Thread` 
> symbol issue. In https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14808 comments, there 
> was an alternative suggestion to redefine the symbol at build time, such as  
> using`-DThread=HotSpotThread`. That would not address issues when symbol were 
> references as string literals. https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14808 also 
> discussed using namespace for hotspot code, which can have multiple 
> benefits/motivations. We could explore further using namespace with more 
> consensus on that approach.
> 
> Contributed by Chuck Rasbold and @jianglizhou.

We (@AlanBateman, @cushon, @magicus, @jerboaa, @pron, @jianglizhou) discussed 
this topic via zoom as part of a regular static/hermetic Java discussions. The 
outcome favors the partial-linking/objcopy to localize symbols for hotspot. 
Here is a summary:

- A general solution is preferred compared to resolving symbol issues case by 
case.
- We can address this for unix-like platforms with toolings supporting 
partial-linking/objcopy for now. @magicus will provide additional information 
on supported gcc versions and considerations for Windows support.
- There is also a preference to localize symbols automatically without editing 
the symbol list manually. In our prototype for handling freetype symbols (as 
mentioned in 
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14808#issuecomment-1631611220), @cjmoon1 
looked into using `nm` to generate symbol list and feed that into `objcopy`. 
That might be do-able for hotspot symbols.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17456#issuecomment-1917753387

Reply via email to