Re: RFR: 8314438: NMT: Performance benchmarks are needed to have a baseline for comparison of improvements [v3]

2023-09-26 Thread Afshin Zafari
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:51:32 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > Should there not be a label to alert NMT folks for reviewing? Thanks for the comment. - PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15563#issuecomment-1735229316

Re: RFR: 8314438: NMT: Performance benchmarks are needed to have a baseline for comparison of improvements [v3]

2023-09-26 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:57:43 GMT, Afshin Zafari wrote: >> A new benchmark for measuring the NMT overhead in `summary` and `detail` >> modes. >> The tests are run using: >> >> make CONF=debug test TEST="micro:java.util.NMTBenchmark" >> MICRO="RESULTS_FORMAT=json" >> >> The results are writte

Re: RFR: 8314438: NMT: Performance benchmarks are needed to have a baseline for comparison of improvements [v3]

2023-09-26 Thread Afshin Zafari
> A new benchmark for measuring the NMT overhead in `summary` and `detail` > modes. > The tests are run using: > > make CONF=debug test TEST="micro:java.util.NMTBenchmark" > MICRO="RESULTS_FORMAT=json" > > The results are written to a JSON file that can be visualized using [JMH > Visualizer]