On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:42:43 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> The build changes almost look good. Just remove the extra added lines at the
> end.
>
> I think this point too still remains:
>
> > 1. TransitiveDependencies seems to be unused now. I assume this is
> > intended. But maybe the java
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 14:09:39 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> Consider a simple module, like:
>>
>> module test {}
>>
>>
>> And compile it with JDK 22 and JDK 21 using:
>> javac --release 21
>>
>> The results of the compilations will differ: when compiling with JDK 21, the
>> mandated java.base depe
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 16:25:59 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request incrementally with four additional
>> commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Fixing tests.
>> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'erikj/pull/16400' into JDK-8318913
>> - Build fixes
>> - Incl
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 14:09:39 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> Consider a simple module, like:
>>
>> module test {}
>>
>>
>> And compile it with JDK 22 and JDK 21 using:
>> javac --release 21
>>
>> The results of the compilations will differ: when compiling with JDK 21, the
>> mandated java.base depe
> Consider a simple module, like:
>
> module test {}
>
>
> And compile it with JDK 22 and JDK 21 using:
> javac --release 21
>
> The results of the compilations will differ: when compiling with JDK 21, the
> mandated java.base dependency will get a version, possibly like
> "21-internal". When
