On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 05:19:45 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of Clang
> to be used for building OpenJDK from 3.5 to 13.
>
> This permits enabling C++17 (JDK-8314488), though Clang 5 might suffice for
> that. A minimum of Clang 13
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of Clang
> to be used for building OpenJDK from 3.5 to 13.
>
> This permits enabling C++17 (JDK-8314488), though Clang 5 might suffice for
> that. A minimum of Clang 13 also obtains a critical bug fix for the
> [[noreturn]]
>
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 08:24:20 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> I don't want to integrate this until the minimum aix-ppc toolchain has been
> updated
@kimbarrett Is anyone working on that problem?
-
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17862#issuecomment-1981399543
On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 07:20:33 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Thanks for reviews/responses. I'll go ahead with integration. We won't be
> reliant on the new version immediately, so we can still reconsider if it
> causes someone problems and they bring it up soon-ish.
Well, no I'm not. I don't want
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 05:19:45 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of Clang
> to be used for building OpenJDK from 3.5 to 13.
>
> This permits enabling C++17 (JDK-8314488), though Clang 5 might suffice for
> that. A minimum of Clang 13
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 05:19:45 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of Clang
> to be used for building OpenJDK from 3.5 to 13.
>
> This permits enabling C++17 (JDK-8314488), though Clang 5 might suffice for
> that. A minimum of Clang 13
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 04:46:24 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> > Unfortunately this will break my workflow on Linux - I use clang to build
> > on Ubuntu 20.04, which is not that old, but it ships with clang 12. This is
> > not a deal breaker, just annoying.
>
> That's unfortunate, but I think the
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:45:45 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> Unfortunately this will break my workflow on Linux - I use clang to build on
> Ubuntu 20.04, which is not that old, but it ships with clang 12. This is not
> a deal breaker, just annoying.
That's unfortunate, but I think the
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 05:19:45 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of Clang
> to be used for building OpenJDK from 3.5 to 13.
>
> This permits enabling C++17 (JDK-8314488), though Clang 5 might suffice for
> that. A minimum of Clang 13
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 05:19:45 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of Clang
> to be used for building OpenJDK from 3.5 to 13.
>
> This permits enabling C++17 (JDK-8314488), though Clang 5 might suffice for
> that. A minimum of Clang 13
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 05:19:45 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of Clang
> to be used for building OpenJDK from 3.5 to 13.
>
> This permits enabling C++17 (JDK-8314488), though Clang 5 might suffice for
> that. A minimum of Clang 13
Please review this change that updates the minimum supported version of Clang
to be used for building OpenJDK from 3.5 to 13.
This permits enabling C++17 (JDK-8314488), though Clang 5 might suffice for
that. A minimum of Clang 13 also obtains a critical bug fix for the [[noreturn]]
attribute (see
12 matches
Mail list logo
