On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:55:04 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> I assume you want to know if we use DAS/DAS1 for debugging purposes on that
>> platform?
>
> I use `das` every day. In contrast, I don't know what `das1` is for.
It does not sound like anyone object to the removal of `JNIEXPORT` for
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:01:50 GMT, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>> Hi all - yes the Windows Arm port is maintained by Microsoft's JDK team. How
>> can we help in this particular case?
>
> I assume you want to know if we use DAS/DAS1 for debugging purposes on that
> platform?
I use `das` every day.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:00:34 GMT, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>> Personally I have never used `das`/`das1` on any AArch64 port when
>> debugging. I guess it was somewhat handy when the backend was originally
>> developed. I would argue that the built-in disassembler of any debugger and
>>
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 12:03:37 GMT, Bernhard Urban-Forster
wrote:
>> Instead of discussing removal of windows/aarch64 (although the general rule
>> in OpenJDK is that ports that are not maintained by anyone should be
>> removed); let's stick to the question here: do we need to export `das1()`
> Once [JDK-8017234](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8017234) has been
> integrated, it is possible to do some cleanup. The goal of
> [JDK-8017234](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8017234) was to not change
> any behavior, even if that behavior seemed odd.
>
> Now let's try to fix
