Re: RFR: JDK-8289798: Update to use jtreg 7 [v5]

2022-08-30 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 11:22:55 GMT, Christian Stein wrote: >> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7. >> >> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the >> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In >> addition, the `requiredVer

Re: RFR: JDK-8289798: Update to use jtreg 7 [v5]

2022-08-30 Thread Christian Stein
On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 09:14:12 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Hello Christian, is it intentional that in some file the minimum required > jtreg version is represented as `7` (`lib-tests.m4`) and in some other files > as `7+1` (GitHub actions config file, then the TEST.ROOT files)? Yes. Some systems

Re: RFR: JDK-8289798: Update to use jtreg 7 [v5]

2022-08-30 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 11:22:55 GMT, Christian Stein wrote: >> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7. >> >> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the >> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In >> addition, the `requiredVer

Re: RFR: JDK-8289798: Update to use jtreg 7 [v5]

2022-08-23 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 11:22:55 GMT, Christian Stein wrote: >> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7. >> >> The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the >> version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In >> addition, the `requiredVer

Re: RFR: JDK-8289798: Update to use jtreg 7 [v5]

2022-08-23 Thread Christian Stein
> Please review the change to update to using jtreg 7. > > The primary change is to the `jib-profiles.js` file, which specifies the > version of jtreg to use, for those systems that rely on this file. In > addition, the `requiredVersion` has been updated in the various `TEST.ROOT` > files. Chr