On Sun, 5 Mar 2023 17:10:08 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
> PS Successful Mach 5 job of default builds and tier 1 tests with this make
> line present.
PPS And for extra measure as suggested by David Holmes, a tier 1 through 5
build job was also successful.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/j
On Sun, 5 Mar 2023 06:19:06 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> While the review of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12800 finishes up, I
>> thought I'd get out for the review the next phase of the FDLIBM port:
>> removing the FDLIBM C sources from the repo.
>>
>> A repo with the changes for JDK-83020
On Sun, 5 Mar 2023 06:19:06 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> While the review of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12800 finishes up, I
>> thought I'd get out for the review the next phase of the FDLIBM port:
>> removing the FDLIBM C sources from the repo.
>>
>> A repo with the changes for JDK-83020
On Sun, 5 Mar 2023 06:19:06 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> While the review of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12800 finishes up, I
>> thought I'd get out for the review the next phase of the FDLIBM port:
>> removing the FDLIBM C sources from the repo.
>>
>> A repo with the changes for JDK-83020
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:27:09 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> make/autoconf/buildjdk-spec.gmk.in line 85:
>>
>>> 83: JVM_LIBS := @OPENJDK_BUILD_JVM_LIBS@
>>> 84:
>>> 85: FDLIBM_CFLAGS := @OPENJDK_BUILD_FDLIBM_CFLAGS@
>>
>> If the hotspot build still needs `FDLIBM_CFLAGS`, then this line needs to
>> st
> While the review of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/12800 finishes up, I
> thought I'd get out for the review the next phase of the FDLIBM port:
> removing the FDLIBM C sources from the repo.
>
> A repo with the changes for JDK-8302027 and this PR successful build on the
> default set of
