On Sat, 4 Nov 2023 06:39:34 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
>> See [JDK-8288719](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8288719) and
>> subsequent
>> [discussion](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2022-May/034635.html)
>> back in 2022.
>>
>> On Arm, we can generate either arm- or thumb-code
> See [JDK-8288719](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8288719) and subsequent
> [discussion](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2022-May/034635.html)
> back in 2022.
>
> On Arm, we can generate either arm- or thumb-code (`-marm` or `-mthumb`).
>
> At the moment, if we don't specify
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 16:17:04 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> See [JDK-8288719](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8288719) and subsequent
> [discussion](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2022-May/034635.html)
> back in 2022.
>
> On Arm, we can generate either arm- or thumb-code (`-marm`
See [JDK-8288719](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8288719) and subsequent
[discussion](https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/build-dev/2022-May/034635.html)
back in 2022.
On Arm, we can generate either arm- or thumb-code (`-marm` or `-mthumb`).
At the moment, if we don't specify an ABI profil