What about CloudBees? (Hudson as a service) Perhaps they grant OS orgs a discount? :) (since the CEO is the formal JBoss CTO)
-Matthias On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Despite various hickups along the way, the new Hudson master and the > extra solaris slave we got from the old master seem to have gone a > long way to addressing the chronic capacity problems we had earlier > ([1] looks a lot better than it used to). Thus the need for my earlier > idea (for which I also lobbied initial budget approval) of setting up > an extra on-demand slave on EC2 for handling load peaks has mostly > gone away. > > So the question is, should I still look at setting up an EC2 slave? > Beyond load balancing, the other reason for running builds in the > cloud is the availability of a wider variety of build environments. > Basically we could provision an on-demand build slave for any > environment for which an AMI exists or can be created. I don't have a > pressing need for that from the projects I work with, but perhaps > others are interested? > > [1] https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/load-statistics?type=hour > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
