Hi all,
I'm sure some of you followed this story :-).
Two questions :
* which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : IMHO
the most active is the Jenkins one)
* do we have to rename hudson.apache.org to jenkins.apache.org
Thoughts ? (and sure no rush :-) )
Thanks,
--
Olivier
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
* which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : IMHO
the most active is the Jenkins one)
Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. Jenkins has
released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL
Jenkins also fixes the Clover.xml problems affecting almost every
clover-enabled build (hopefully):
https://github.com/lacostej/jenkins/commit/31b8361d3152fb7970e1c11c906a763fa
1aa5c25 (see also attached issue mail arriving here few minutes ago). It's
very important to fix this ASAP, as we have
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
* which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : IMHO
the most active is the Jenkins one)
Time will tell, but I'm betting on the
+1 for jenkins
for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then which one
I don't care that much.
Nicolas
Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit :
+1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect.
Nige
On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3,
+1 for Jenkins.
regards,
Giri
On Feb 3, 2011, at 8:08 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:
+1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect.
Nige
On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28
+1 for Jenkins
+1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao
And mark hudson.a.o as deprecated.
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21
An: builds@apache.org
Betreff: Re: Questions : install
+1 for redirect. It will allow us time to switch our cron scripts
which pull information from hudson. Will anything else I our URL's
to the artifacts change?
On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Jan Matèrne apa...@materne.de wrote:
+1 for Jenkins
+1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao
And
I'd say get rid of hudsdon.a.o all together because Oracle is claiming the
name as a trademark.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jan Matèrne apa...@materne.de wrote:
+1 for Jenkins
+1 for redirecting hudson.a.o to jenkins.ao
And mark hudson.a.o as deprecated.
Jan
-Ursprüngliche
Not sure it's been trademarked, but if it has, I'm pretty sure that it
doesn't apply to subdomains. I'm okay with migrating the domain name,
but there should be a grace period.
Either way, the redirect will make sure the Jenkins name shows up for
everyone who cares .. :)
On Feb 3, 2011, at
All,
The Hudson domain name go, the Jenkins name will NOT appear in its place.
We need to learn and not use brand names as domain (sub) domains.
So we need to think of a generic name, apply it real soon - within the next
day or two, then redirect the old Hudson name for a few days.
get
Hi,
The Hudson domain name go, the Jenkins name will NOT appear in its place.
That's exactly my opinion, too.
We need to learn and not use brand names as domain (sub) domains.
Jenkins is not a brand (currently) but it may get one. More important is:
why do we need the product name as part
+1 for builds as the domain name.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
+1! Just simple: builds.apache.org?
-Original Message-
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 8:46 AM
To: builds@apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
Folks, by all means choose another name, but please don't drag
'trademark' into it.
+1 for builds.a.o
2011/2/3 Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com:
+1 for builds as the domain name.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
+1! Just simple: builds.apache.org?
--
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy
http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy
OK, I'll expand. Based on all the reading I've done about trademark
law, inside and outside of the ASF, I think that it is utterly
far-fetched to worry about the idea that Oracle will assert some sort
of trademark infringement if we have a domain name of
hudson.apache.org for any purpose in
Even if the trademark stuff is marginally relevant, having the redirect in
place actually lets us change the real name
sooner rather than later and thus be more cautious rather than less.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
So I claim that the trademark
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
+1! Just simple: builds.apache.org?
We already have http://ci.apache.org/ that contains buildbot under
http://ci.apache.org/buildbot.html. I'd put Jenkins under
http://ci.apache.org/jenkins/.
Keeping the product name in
It is product names of external products we no longer want in any sub-domains,
that includes Hudson and Jenkins, nothing to do with trademarks and certainly
nothing to do with Oracle, we are following Koshukes code as a choice by the
community and we have committers involved with that
Fair enough Paul, but that was a preference. They would not have been
sued for trademark violations over the name java.
On Feb 3, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
Actually, the reason Apache chose the jakarta project is because they
didn't want to use java in the
Totally agree.
On Feb 3, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks, by all means choose another name, but please don't drag
'trademark' into it.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
Actually, the reason Apache chose the
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Just simple: builds.apache.org?
+1
/niklas
22 matches
Mail list logo
