Hi,
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Gav... ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
I didn't really want to break up Buildbot pages and its well established
(2 years+) links to cater for another build system.
It is possible to add /jenkins without breaking them,
I'll have a think about it some more,
-Original Message-
From: Tammo van Lessen [mailto:tvanles...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 7:52 PM
To: builds@apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
On 04.02.2011 00:46, Jukka Zitting wrote:
We already have http://ci.apache.org
-Original Message-
From: Tammo van Lessen [mailto:tvanles...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 8:35 PM
To: builds@apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
On 04.02.2011 11:27, Gav... wrote:
On 04.02.2011 00:46, Jukka Zitting wrote:
We
Hi all,
I'm sure some of you followed this story :-).
Two questions :
* which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : IMHO
the most active is the Jenkins one)
* do we have to rename hudson.apache.org to jenkins.apache.org
Thoughts ? (and sure no rush :-) )
Thanks,
--
Olivier
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
* which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : IMHO
the most active is the Jenkins one)
Time will tell, but I'm betting on the Jenkins branch. Jenkins has
released a 1.396 release which contains a fix for JNPL
: Niklas Gustavsson [mailto:nik...@protocol7.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 2:39 PM
To: builds@apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
* which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
* which code branch do we have to follow ( Jenkins or Oracle : IMHO
the most active is the Jenkins one)
Time will tell, but I'm betting on the
+1 for jenkins
for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then which one
I don't care that much.
Nicolas
Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit :
+1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect.
Nige
On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3,
+1 for Jenkins.
regards,
Giri
On Feb 3, 2011, at 8:08 AM, Nigel Daley wrote:
+1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect.
Nige
On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:28
Jenkins instead of Hudson
+1 for jenkins
for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then
which one I don't care that much.
Nicolas
Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit :
+1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect.
Nige
On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM, Matthias
And mark hudson.a.o as deprecated.
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21
An: builds@apache.org
Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
+1 for jenkins
for the host name I
Nachricht-
Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21
An: builds@apache.org
Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
+1 for jenkins
for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then
which
hudson.a.o as deprecated.
Jan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nicolas Lalevée [mailto:nicolas.lale...@hibnet.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Februar 2011 17:21
An: builds@apache.org
Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
+1 for jenkins
for the host name I think we should
thinking before I just pick one.
Gav...
-Original Message-
From: Scott O'Bryan [mailto:darkar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 5:59 AM
To: builds@apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
Not sure it's been trademarked, but if it has, I'm pretty
Hi,
The Hudson domain name go, the Jenkins name will NOT appear in its place.
That's exactly my opinion, too.
We need to learn and not use brand names as domain (sub) domains.
Jenkins is not a brand (currently) but it may get one. More important is:
why do we need the product name as part
+1 for builds as the domain name.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
+1! Just simple: builds.apache.org?
-Original Message-
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 8:46 AM
To: builds@apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
Folks, by all means choose another name, but please don't drag
'trademark
+1 for builds.a.o
2011/2/3 Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com:
+1 for builds as the domain name.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
+1! Just simple: builds.apache.org?
--
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy
http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy
@apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
Folks, by all means choose another name, but please don't drag
'trademark' into it.
Excuse me? How did this sentence help the conversation?
Gav...
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org
wrote
Even if the trademark stuff is marginally relevant, having the redirect in
place actually lets us change the real name
sooner rather than later and thus be more cautious rather than less.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.comwrote:
So I claim that the trademark
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
+1! Just simple: builds.apache.org?
We already have http://ci.apache.org/ that contains buildbot under
http://ci.apache.org/buildbot.html. I'd put Jenkins under
http://ci.apache.org/jenkins/.
Keeping the product name in
[mailto:bimargul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 February 2011 9:35 AM
To: builds@apache.org
Subject: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
OK, I'll expand. Based on all the reading I've done about trademark
law, inside and outside of the ASF, I think that it is utterly
far-fetched to worry
: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
+1 for jenkins
for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then
which one I don't care that much.
Nicolas
Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit :
+1 for Jenkins. +1 for a redirect.
Nige
On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:23 AM
. Februar 2011 17:21
An: builds@apache.org
Betreff: Re: Questions : install Jenkins instead of Hudson
+1 for jenkins
for the host name I think we should have only one official url. Then
which one I don't care that much.
Nicolas
Le 3 févr. 2011 à 17:08, Nigel Daley a écrit :
+1 for Jenkins
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Just simple: builds.apache.org?
+1
/niklas
25 matches
Mail list logo
