Re: Initial mock build targets for Mageia Cauldron and request for info on metalink setup

2016-03-14 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:43:44PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >> controlled through the "locales" package and languages are provided >> through its various subpackages. I think the setup is similar to how >> Fedora now has it in F24 and rawhid

Re: Initial mock build targets for Mageia Cauldron and request for info on metalink setup

2016-03-14 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 01:43:44PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > controlled through the "locales" package and languages are provided > through its various subpackages. I think the setup is similar to how > Fedora now has it in F24 and rawhide. By default, the "C" locale is > what is provided as the ba

Re: Initial mock build targets for Mageia Cauldron and request for info on metalink setup

2016-03-14 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 14.3.2016 v 02:47 Neal Gompa napsal(a): >> Today, I'm pleased to provide a patch to do just that. The attached >> patch adds the initial build target configs for Mageia Cauldron on >> 32-bit and 64-bit x86. > > I see several problems: >

Re: Initial mock build targets for Mageia Cauldron and request for info on metalink setup

2016-03-14 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 14.3.2016 v 02:47 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > Today, I'm pleased to provide a patch to do just that. The attached > patch adds the initial build target configs for Mageia Cauldron on > 32-bit and 64-bit x86. I see several problems: 1) mock -r etc/mock/mageia-cauldron-x86_64.cfg --shell ... Start:

Initial mock build targets for Mageia Cauldron and request for info on metalink setup

2016-03-13 Thread Neal Gompa
Hello all, Over the last several months, I've been working in Mageia on enabling the use of DNF for managing software in the distribution[0]. One of the consequences of this is that we're now able to have packages built using Mock. Indeed, it was intended as part of the development to enable build

Sigul: "WARNING: Invalid request: Required field rpm-release missing" -- what does this mean?

2015-04-27 Thread John Florian
; connected 2015-04-27 16:19:50,161 INFO: Request: 'import-signature' = '\x00\x00\x00\x01', 'key' = 'mdct-legacy', 'op' = 'sign-rpm', 'return-data' = '\x00\x00\x00\x00', 'user' = 'd13677' 2015-04-

Re: request

2010-11-12 Thread Alan Franzoni
On 11/12/10 4:43 AM, Jinze Xue wrote: > hello! > I want to build some rpms in fedora's build system ,can I be a user of > fedora koji?or fedora sparc koji? > thanks! Fedora Koji is really suited if you want to setup a continuous packaging system. If you just want to rebuild a package every now an

request

2010-11-11 Thread Jinze Xue
hello! I want to build some rpms in fedora's build system ,can I be a user of fedora koji?or fedora sparc koji? thanks! -- buildsys mailing list buildsys@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/buildsys