On Monday 02 November 2009 11:13:33 Deva wrote:
> All,
please do not top post, and please dont hijack threads. your issue has
nothing to do with Ruben's issue, so you should start your own thread. unless
of course your issue has already been resolved by someone like Denys.
-mike
signature.as
On Monday 02 November 2009 17:13, Deva wrote:
> All,
> I am trying to make use of udhcpd -0.9.8 version.
http://udhcp.busybox.net/
"The udhcp package is no longer maintained/packaged
as a standalone project. It has been fully integrated
into busybox. If you want to use only udhcp, you should
down
On Monday 02 November 2009 12:55:52 Cristian Zamfir wrote:
> I have been trying to find some bug reports from July-August 2008.
> For instance, bug http://bugs.busybox.net/view.php?id=4544 that is
> described here
> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2008-August/066760.html , but
> also s
Dan Fandrich schrieb:
> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 04:03:21AM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> With it, where are we? Does busybox compile with Watcom?
>> With allyesconfig? defconfig? randomconfig?
>
> I have it working with 95 applets so far, but that still requires a handful
> of ugly changes to
Are you sure that /system/bin is in your path?
2009/11/2 Deva
> All,
> I am trying to make use of udhcpd -0.9.8 version.
> I have cross compiled the code for ARM. When i started the udhcpd as a
> post-zygote service using init.rc, it said udhcpd not found. But i am sure
> that it is there in /s
Hi!
Two tiny patches:
* http://busybox.net/~dvv/patch/fbsplash.patch : makes fbsplash able
to handle zipped images, when image is specified via -s option
* http://busybox.net/~dvv/patch/hotplug.patch : makes mdev available
under "hotplug" alias -- this allows it for seamless usage as hotplug
help
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 04:03:21AM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> With it, where are we? Does busybox compile with Watcom?
> With allyesconfig? defconfig? randomconfig?
I have it working with 95 applets so far, but that still requires a handful
of ugly changes to the build scripts (which are more
Hi,
I have been trying to find some bug reports from July-August 2008.
For instance, bug http://bugs.busybox.net/view.php?id=4544 that is
described here http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2008-August/066760.html
, but also some older bugs.
Unfortunately, it seems that those bug repor
All,
I am trying to make use of udhcpd -0.9.8 version.
I have cross compiled the code for ARM. When i started the udhcpd as a
post-zygote service using init.rc, it said udhcpd not found. But i am sure
that it is there in /system/bin.
Error - udhcpd: not found
Can someone tell me how to start this
>>> util-linux/volume_id/btrfs.c:32: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
>>> before '__le64'
>
> That's why using uintNN_t is preferred. Those are standard types.
> They will always work.
I see.
>
> I wonder why kernel uses __u32 etc instead, with no sign
> of gradual migration to uint32_t?
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
>>
>> util-linux/volume_id/btrfs.c:32: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
>> before '__le64'
>> util-linux/volume_id/btrfs.c:51: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
>> before '__le64'
>> util-linux/volume_id/btrfs.c: In functi
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:18 AM, ladislav klenovic wrote:
> 2009/11/1 Denys Vlasenko
>>
>> On Thursday 29 October 2009 15:55, ladislav klenovic wrote:
>> > As Detlef said I don't know have to specify that in inittab thus I run
>> > the
>> > shell regardless whether there is or not a debug console
2009/11/1 Denys Vlasenko
> On Thursday 29 October 2009 15:55, ladislav klenovic wrote:
> > As Detlef said I don't know have to specify that in inittab thus I run
> the
> > shell regardless whether there is or not a debug console.
> > I choose the tty0 according to busybox 1.2.2 which works fine f
13 matches
Mail list logo
