R: Re: coordinated compliance efforts addresses the issues of this thread (was Re: Amusing article about busybox)

2012-10-12 Thread farmat...@tiscali.it
Hi, one more argument will show how your position about the number of developers involved in enforcement and the number of lines of code written by them is totally wrong. That is probably due to the fact that you yourself are a developer and therefore your view of things is biased. Let us go to the

Re: coordinated compliance efforts addresses the issues of this thread

2012-10-12 Thread Bradley M. Kuhn
Felipe Contreras wrote at 12:11 (CEST) on Thursday: > I have never fought for my software rights, and I still have those > rights. I have never fought for my freedom of speech rights, and yet I > still have them. As long as the law is not modified, the rights will > remain there. > You can disagre

Re: coordinated compliance efforts addresses the issues of this thread

2012-10-12 Thread Bradley M. Kuhn
Felipe Contreras wrote at 11:55 (CEST) on Thursday: > I'm only interested in Linux enforcement. The enforcement I mentioned by Red Hat was indeed Linux enforcement. > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: >> I remind you that Conservancy has never caused the "nightmare scenari