Re: [PATCH] losetup: fix util-linux compatibility

On Wednesday 06 March 2013 16:26:32 Mandeep Singh Baines wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > > On 5 March 2013 01:33:12 Mandeep Singh Baines wrote: > >> Added -a support. Also made sure -f works as follows: > >> > >> losetup [-r] [-o offset] {-f|loopdev} fil

Re: [PATCH] traceroute: free some dynamically allocated blocks returned by xzalloc()

On 2013-03-08 14:38, Guilherme Maciel Ferreira wrote: Hi, the documentation says the Busybox leaves to exit() the responsability of applet's memory clean up. But you guys avoid any memory deallocation that can be released when the applet exit (to save size)? That is what it says in busybox's T

[PATCH] traceroute: free some dynamically allocated blocks returned by xzalloc()

From: Guilherme Maciel Ferreira Signed-off-by: Guilherme Maciel Ferreira --- networking/traceroute.c | 15 +-- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/networking/traceroute.c b/networking/traceroute.c index 6b7b2eb..0c18d6c 100644 --- a/networking/tracerout

Re: [PATCH] traceroute: free some dynamically allocated blocks returned by xzalloc()

Hi, the documentation says the Busybox leaves to exit() the responsability of applet's memory clean up. But you guys avoid any memory deallocation that can be released when the applet exit (to save size)? Regards, 2013/3/7 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer : > On 7 March 2013 19:47:28 guilherme.maciel.fe