busybox will not run any other binary - configuration issue on my end

2013-03-12 Thread q5sys
I'm having a problem getting busybox to run anything else other than itself. I'm using BusyBox v1.19.4. I'm 100% sure this is NOT a busybox bug... but something I'm doing wrong on my end, and I was looking to get pointed into the right direction so I can resolve my problem. So far this

Re: busybox will not run any other binary - configuration issue on my end

2013-03-12 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 12:35 -0400, q5sys wrote: however when I try to start any other program, like another shell for example, zsh, bash, etc. Busybox returns that the command is not found. Usually when I see this it means you're trying to run a 32bit application on a system without runtime

Re: platform: use KERNEL_VERSION to simplify uClibc version checking

2013-03-12 Thread Sedat Dilek
These lines (isolated) from [1] look really strange to me... ... +#if defined(__UCLIBC__) UCLIBC_VERSION KERNEL_VERSION(0, 9, 30) ... +#if defined(__UCLIBC__) UCLIBC_VERSION KERNEL_VERSION(0, 9, 32) ... I can understand you want to use that existing define, but reading them... strange.

Re: busybox will not run any other binary - configuration issue on my end

2013-03-12 Thread Michael Conrad
On 3/12/2013 1:39 PM, Paul Smith wrote: On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 12:35 -0400, q5sys wrote: however when I try to start any other program, like another shell for example, zsh, bash, etc. Busybox returns that the command is not found. The kernel tries to invoke the proper ld.so but can't find it,

Re: busybox will not run any other binary - configuration issue on my end

2013-03-12 Thread q5sys
On 2013-03-12 13:39, Paul Smith wrote: On Tue, 2013-03-12 at 12:35 -0400, q5sys wrote: however when I try to start any other program, like another shell for example, zsh, bash, etc. Busybox returns that the command is not found. Usually when I see this it means you're trying to run a 32bit