On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:53 AM, John Spencer
maillist-busy...@barfooze.de wrote:
bb_common_bufsiz1 is already zeroed i hope?
yes
___
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
See attached.
diff --git a/coreutils/uname.c b/coreutils/uname.c
index b96d76b..2568962 100644
--- a/coreutils/uname.c
+++ b/coreutils/uname.c
@@ -139,7 +139,11 @@ int uname_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
#endif
strcpy(uname_info.processor, unknown_str);
On 2013-09-17 18:56, Rich Felker wrote:
- strcpy(uname_info.os, GNU/Linux);
+ strcpy(uname_info.os,
+#ifdef __GLIBC__
+ GNU/
+#endif
+ Linux);
I'd agree that most BusyBox-based systems can hardly be called
GNU/Linux, even with glibc. It seems inappropriate