Re: [Question] Questions about the BusyBox specification.

2014-06-30 Thread Isaac Dunham
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 09:26:27AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:06:07AM +0200, Frank Ihle wrote: > > >> (6) Is there a (stateless/statefull) firewall for BusyBox ? > > > think this is not related to busybox. Use iptables? > > The lack of an iptables command in Busybox i

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add a unit-testing framework to Busybox

2014-06-30 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Bartosz Gołaszewski wrote: > 2014-06-26 14:12 GMT+02:00 Rich Felker : >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:35:53PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: >>> Global data is initialized to zero at program load time. >> >> And even if you need a non-zero initial value, static initial

Re: udhcpd leases file is not written

2014-06-30 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Vinothkumar Vivekanandan wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Denys Vlasenko > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Vinothkumar Vivekanandan >> wrote: >> > I am using BusyBox based dhcp server, udhcpd. >> > >> > This is my configuration file. But no

Re: ftpd authentication [PATCH] ftpd: NOMMU/chroot fix

2014-06-30 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 01:55:26PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Morten Kvistgaard >> wrote: >> > A small detail, why do you check if the root_fd is valid? Eg. >> > >> > ... >> > if (G.root_fd >= 0) { >> > ..

Re: [Bug 7202] New: add fatattr support

2014-06-30 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Pascal Bellard wrote: > Can you check the attached patch ? Applied with some edits. Please check current git. Thanks! ___ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Re: LZO security bug might affect Busybox

2014-06-30 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Saturday 28 June 2014 15:33, Isaac Dunham wrote: > There's an integer overflow in LZO (LMS-2014-06-16-1): > http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/06/26/20 > > I suspect that this affects Busybox; the code would be in > archival/libarchive/lzo1x_d.c > But I wouldn't be able to verify t

Re: [Question] Questions about the BusyBox specification.

2014-06-30 Thread Thomas Geulig
Hi Frank, Am 30.06.2014 08:46, schrieb Frank Ihle: Now nearly everbody told me that BusyBox ain't an OS in a typical matter ;), I already knew that before. The point is why I still ask, because I'm not a BusyBox "guru" that I can say what programs and tools are available to know the full functio