Hullo Denys,
Can you help us again.
I’ve posted the patch for ftpd authentication, but it seems that the trunk
getpwnam (et al.) have gone haywire.
(I could override the getpwnam as Tanguy says, but it seems a little flawed.)
Regards,
Morten Kvistgaard
From: Tanguy Pruvot
Yeah, mayhaps... Thanks for the prompt reply. I tried to debug the code,
but the busybox code here is a bit messy heavily abusing macros in C and
all that. It ain't easy I must confess!
For instance, see this section:
http://git.busybox.net/busybox/tree/libpwdgrp/pwd_grp.c#n227
The _source_ is
Here is my tested fix without being to debug the busybox code, so only code
reading and understanding were my friends:
commit 9610650b6ce2a4c1904f78a2dcdb47cad3d2e3d1
Author: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
Date: Tue Aug 5 11:42:24 2014 +0100
Allow 256 bytes long usernames as per Unix standards
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 12:46:08 you wrote:
Here is my tested fix without being to debug the busybox code, so only code
reading and understanding were my friends:
commit 9610650b6ce2a4c1904f78a2dcdb47cad3d2e3d1
Author: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
Date: Tue Aug 5 11:42:24 2014 +0100
I disagree. There is nothing to reject here. It fixes _my issue_ at hand.
If you want to fix other bugs in your system that you are facing in
reality, by all means, fix them in a separate change.
I definitely do not agree with dynamically allocated buffer for the simple
reasons of:
1) Slow.
2)
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 14:27:57 you wrote:
I disagree. There is nothing to reject here. It fixes _my issue_ at hand.
If you want to fix other bugs in your system that you are facing in
reality, by all means, fix them in a separate change.
I definitely do not agree with dynamically
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:42 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 14:27:57 you wrote:
I disagree. There is nothing to reject here. It fixes _my issue_ at hand.
If you want to fix other bugs in your system that you are facing in
reality, by all means, fix them in a
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 14:47:53 you wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:42 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 14:27:57 you wrote:
I disagree. There is nothing to reject here. It fixes _my issue_ at hand.
If you want to fix other bugs in your system that you
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:06 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 14:47:53 you wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:42 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 14:27:57 you wrote:
I disagree. There is nothing to reject here. It fixes _my
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:06 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 14:47:53 you wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:42 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 14:27:57 you
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 15:21:49 you wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:06 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 14:47:53 you wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:42 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:06 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 15:21:49 you wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:06 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2014
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:06 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 15:21:49 you wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:06 PM,
commit 980965767ef3ace983746ee25e92665b87d16755
Author: Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
Date: Tue Aug 5 11:42:24 2014 +0100
Allow 256 bytes long usernames as per Unix standards (usually)
diff --git a/libpwdgrp/pwd_grp.c b/libpwdgrp/pwd_grp.c
index 2060d78..9e4424f 100644
---
To challenge this a bit further for completeness: the other option would be
to limit the username length to 32 or 48 bytes rather than allowing the
whole 128-byte desktop-range. 256 does look like a bit excessive that
getconf returns:
getconf LOGIN_NAME_MAX
256
I find it hard to achieve in even
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
sudo busybox adduser
f
passwd: unknown user
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 18:09:08 you wrote:
To challenge this a bit further for completeness: the other option would be
to limit the username length to 32 or 48 bytes rather than allowing the
whole 128-byte desktop-range. 256 does look like a bit excessive that
getconf returns:
getconf
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 17:05:11 you wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:06 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 15:21:49 you wrote:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org
it will be / only in case the home dir does not exist at login time
as the login program does chdir to the home
That is what the linked page also says, yes.
dir else
you would be locked out of a broken system (damaged partition
mounted to /home, /root folder corrupted on main file
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:24 PM, tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2014 18:09:08 you wrote:
To challenge this a bit further for completeness: the other option would
be
to limit the username length to 32 or 48 bytes rather than allowing the
whole 128-byte desktop-range.
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Morten Kvistgaard
m...@pch-engineering.dk wrote:
I've attached a patch for adding basic authentication to the ftpd.
This used to work with version 1.21.1. And walter harms tested it with
1.22.1. And it worked with trunk 3 months ago.
It doesn't seem to work
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 09:10 PM, Rich Felker said:
I suspect it's an issue with some option to run busybox commands in
the shell process itself rather than forking and execing. Seeing a
full config file would be useful.
I've attached a config I've been using for a while as plain text.
If it
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 03:00 PM, Michael Conrad said:
On 8/4/2014 2:48 PM, James Bowlin wrote:
[ $LANG = en_US.UTF-8 ] || LANG=en_US.UTF-8 exec $0 $@
I think you should focus on this bug. Which busybox version?
Which libc version? Because my busybox runs it just fine. (as
should any
23 matches
Mail list logo
