Busybox utilities are written in whatever way uses the fewest bytes.
Most standard utilities are optimized for speed. Sometimes the reduced
footprint of busybox can offset the lack of speed optimization because
it can remain in disk cache or processor cache. And sometimes not.
If your bash
Bash has some built-in too.
Sam
On 31 Aug 2018 19:11, "James Hanley" wrote:
> We had some bash scripts that we converted to use busybox ash as bash
> (removed any array constructs) and when comparing the two scripts - it
> seems that running them under busybox yields less idle time compared
>
