On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 00:27:50 +0200
Xabier Oneca -- xOneca wrote:
> This option is the long version of -a and -m.
>
> function old new delta
> touch_main 484 539 +55
> .rodata
This option is the long version of -a and -m.
function old new delta
touch_main 484 539 +55
.rodata 103649 103680 +31
static.touch_longopts
Hi all,
> This option is the long version of -a and -m.
>
> function old new delta
> touch_main 484 553 +69
> .rodata 103649 103681 +32
>
Hi Peter,
> Using utimensat(2) allows us to set times in nanosecond precision. Also logic
> is
> simplified and code shrinked.
>
> function old new delta
> touch_main 513 479 -34
>
This option is the long version of -a and -m.
function old new delta
touch_main 484 553 +69
.rodata 103649 103681 +32
static.touch_longopts
Using utimensat(2) allows us to set times in nanosecond precision. Also logic is
simplified and code shrinked.
function old new delta
touch_main 513 479 -34
coreutils forbids this combination.
Signed-off-by: Xabier Oneca
---
coreutils/touch.c | 18 +++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/coreutils/touch.c b/coreutils/touch.c
index a00ee0ba4..6a4ffb400 100644
--- a/coreutils/touch.c
+++ b/coreutils/touch.c
Applied all 3 patches. Thank you.
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:44 AM Xabier Oneca -- xOneca
wrote:
>
> > Long options handling (getopt32 vs getopt32long) is done in libb.h, no need
> > to
> > care here of the same logic. This cleans the code a bit.
> >
> > Also, --no-create was grouped as a SUSv3
On 11/04/2021 07.41, urmum-69 wrote:
> This patch changes the functions used to update timestamps in touch.
>
> Before, utimes() and lutimes() were used, which had certain
> disadvantages.
> They are unable to handle nanosecond timestamps, and implementations of
> certain features like -a and -m
