Re: pidof and pgrep are slower than a grep /proc/[1-9]*/comm

On Mon, 4 Sept 2023 at 22:54, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Sept 2023 at 21:52, Roberto A. Foglietta > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 4 Sept 2023 at 18:53, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > > > > > > can you please give us a hint, > > > what makes your system special? > > > maybe several 1000

Re: pidof and pgrep are slower than a grep /proc/[1-9]*/comm

On Mon, 4 Sept 2023 at 21:52, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Sept 2023 at 18:53, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > > > > can you please give us a hint, > > what makes your system special? > > maybe several 1000 processes? > > Hi Bastian, > > on that system there are 8 Arm 64bit cores 4x1.8GHz

Re: pidof and pgrep are slower than a grep /proc/[1-9]*/comm

On Mon, 4 Sept 2023 at 18:53, Bastian Bittorf wrote: > > can you please give us a hint, > what makes your system special? > maybe several 1000 processes? Hi Bastian, on that system there are 8 Arm 64bit cores 4x1.8GHz + 4x2.0Ghz put under conservative frequency governors usually sleeping but

Re: pidof and pgrep are slower than a grep /proc/[1-9]*/comm

can you please give us a hint, what makes your system special? maybe several 1000 processes? can you please show, how you measure the time differences on your 2nd problem? thanks & bye, Bastian Bittorf ___ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net