Re: Failing to boot busybox inside initramfs

On 04/06/2011 09:36 AM, Christian Gmeiner wrote: > [3.648006] VFS: Cannot open root device "(null)" or unknown-block(8,1) Are you missing the /init -> /bin/busybox symlink? Daniel -- Dipl.-Math. Daniel Glöckner, emlix GmbH, http://www.emlix.com Fon +49 551

[PATCH] libbb: don't ignore result of xrealloc

Even on single byte expansions the pointer may change. Signed-off-by: Daniel Glöckner --- libbb/read.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libbb/read.c b/libbb/read.c index a0c0cc6..b58982b 100644 --- a/libbb/read.c +++ b/libbb/read.c @@ -229,7 +229,7

Re: [PATCH] libbb: don't ignore result of xrealloc

On 05/15/2009 05:57 PM, Daniel Glöckner wrote: > Even on single byte expansions the pointer may change. Sorry, I didn't really read the surrounding code. It's actually trying to shrink the memory block. According to glibc's info page realloc guarantees the same address only if

Re: Switching Fedora machine away from systemd

to figure that out. It's HandleLidSwitch=ignore in logind.conf. Of course it is the login manager that controls power management... Best regards, Daniel -- Dipl.-Math. Daniel Glöckner, emlix GmbH, http://www.emlix.com Fon +49 551 30664-0, Fax +49 551 30664-11, Gothaer Platz 3, 37083 Göttingen,