Re: [PATCH] free: include SReclaimable in cached value

2019-06-21 Thread Lukas Rusak
Is someone available to acknowledge this? Thanks! On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 14:35 Lukas Rusak wrote: > I noticed that the 'used' values from busybox free and > procps-ng free differed so I looked into why. It turns > out that procps-ng uses the "SReclaimable" value

[PATCH] free: include SReclaimable in cached value

2019-06-10 Thread Lukas Rusak
I noticed that the 'used' values from busybox free and procps-ng free differed so I looked into why. It turns out that procps-ng uses the "SReclaimable" value as part of the cached value. This was changed in procps-ng commit 05d751c4f076a2f0118b914c5e51cfbb4762ad8e --- procps/free.c | 22 +++