Signed-off-by: Romain Naour
---
loginutils/su.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/loginutils/su.c b/loginutils/su.c
index c51f26f..f812505 100644
--- a/loginutils/su.c
+++ b/loginutils/su.c
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ int su_main(int argc UNUSED_PARAM, char **argv)
if
Hi,
Le 04/03/2014 22:27, Romain Naour a écrit :
Signed-off-by: Romain Naour
---
loginutils/su.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/loginutils/su.c b/loginutils/su.c
index c51f26f..f812505 100644
--- a/loginutils/su.c
+++ b/loginutils/su.c
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ int su_main(int
Hi,
Le 13/03/2014 23:16, John Spencer a écrit :
Rich Felker wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:15:45AM +0100, John Spencer wrote:
Romain Naour wrote:
Hi,
Le 04/03/2014 22:27, Romain Naour a écrit :
Signed-off-by: Romain Naour
---
loginutils/su.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff
Hello,
Le 25/10/2019 à 09:54, David Demelier a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I don't know where is the appropriate place to ask. I've upgraded my toolchain
> to LLVM 9 on my Clang based Linux distribution and everything built and ran
> fine
> except... busybox.
>
> I suspect busybox is built with some i
Hi David,
Le 28/10/2019 à 08:23, David Demelier a écrit :
> Le 25/10/2019 à 10:00, Romain Naour a écrit :
>> There is an initial patch for this issue:
>> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2019-June/087306.html
>
> Do you have a local version of that patch? I can
Hi Denys,
Le 08/11/2019 à 14:54, Denys Vlasenko a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:04 AM Romain Naour wrote:
>> Le 28/10/2019 à 08:23, David Demelier a écrit :
>>> Le 25/10/2019 à 10:00, Romain Naour a écrit :
>>>> There is an initial patch for this issue:
Hello,
As reported by Carlos Santos on the Buildroot mailing list [1], the current
busybox release trigger some build issues with glibc 2.31 and musl 1.2.0.
Recent change in busybox fixes those issues:
- for glibc 2.31:
Remove stime() function calls [2]
- for musl 1.2.0: date:
Use
