On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Jiri Prchal wrote:
[ ... ]
renew|bound)
> echo "Setting IP address $ip on $interface"
> - ifconfig $interface $ip $NETMASK $BROADCAST
> + if [ -x /sbin/ip ]; then
> + ip addr add $ip$NETMASK
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Harald Becker ra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi !
bbox's find does support -not - you need to enable DESKTOP
in .config.
Why?
The idea behind this was space saving on none desktop version
(e.g. initramfs versions of Busybox). The base syntax of find was
the explation
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Karl Godt karlg...@excite.de wrote:
Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Karl Godt karlg...@excite.de wrote:
Dear Busybox-Team !
I am running Puppy Linux as my main OS, that relies on Busybox in the
intial
ramdisk about some 70% and also
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Karl Godt karlg...@excite.de wrote:
Dear Busybox-Team !
I am running Puppy Linux as my main OS, that relies on Busybox in the intial
ramdisk about some 70% and also uses Busybox applets after switch_root
quite a lot .
The Initial-Ramdisk is not used after
Hmm, can you send your patches via git-email? It's easier for a review.
Do we need all this zipWTF variables now (when we have gzip|bzip2|xz)?
gzipPid, zipMode, zip_exec etc.
What about using ct (shortform of compressor) instead (ctPid,
ctMode, ct_exec, etc.)?
- Sedat -
2013/9/20 John Spencer
Is ENABLE_FEATURE_SEAMLESS_GZ missing here?
...
+static const char compressor[][6] = {
# if ENABLE_FEATURE_SEAMLESS_GZ
+[ct_gzip - 1] = gzip,
#endif
+#if ENABLE_FEATURE_SEAMLESS_BZ2
+[ct_bzip2 - 1] = bzip2,
+#endif
+#if ENABLE_FEATURE_SEAMLESS_XZ
+[ct_xz - 1]= xz,
Hi,
...guess this is a Linux-Filesystem specific question... Why not ask
also on linux-fsdevel linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org?
Regards,
- Sedat -
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Harald Becker ra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
as here are several experts, and not so much traffic at the moment, I
throw
These lines (isolated) from [1] look really strange to me...
...
+#if defined(__UCLIBC__) UCLIBC_VERSION KERNEL_VERSION(0, 9, 30)
...
+#if defined(__UCLIBC__) UCLIBC_VERSION KERNEL_VERSION(0, 9, 32)
...
I can understand you want to use that existing define, but reading
them... strange.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Joshua Kahlenberg jbkb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 03:13:38 -0500, Denys Vlasenko
vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Joshua Kahlenberg jbkb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry, previous patch was wrapped
And this version is
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
As with messages in libbb/messages.c and their declarations
in include/libbb.h, there are a few other places where
ALIGN1 (force no alignment) is used in definition but not
in declaration, which leads to miscompiles. Fix
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
On 19.07.2012 13:59, Sedat Dilek wrote:
Can you label your patches, please?
Like this:
busybox.h: declare more strings with ALIGN1
The patch touches 3 files. Should I list them all?
I had Aurel's patch in mind which
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Denys Vlasenko
vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Monday 18 June 2012 21:47, Bernhard Walle wrote:
Am 18.06.12 01:52, schrieb Denys Vlasenko:
On Wednesday 13 June 2012 22:11, Bernhard Walle wrote:
Of course busybox cannot be used on Darwin (Mac OS X), but it
[1] does NOT show recent commits to busybox in Git-Web whereas
buildroot commits are displayed.
Can you or an admin please check this?
Thanks.
- Sedat -
[1] http://git.busybox.net/busybox/
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Denys Vlasenko vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at
Hmm, [2] shows recent changes, suspect!
- Sedat -
[2] http://git.busybox.net/busybox/log/
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@googlemail.com wrote:
[1] does NOT show recent commits to busybox in Git-Web whereas
buildroot commits are displayed.
Can you or an admin please
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Peter Korsgaard jac...@sunsite.dk wrote:
Sedat == Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@googlemail.com writes:
Sedat [1] does NOT show recent commits to busybox in Git-Web whereas
Sedat buildroot commits are displayed.
Sedat Can you or an admin please check this?
Yes
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Rich Felker dal...@aerifal.cx wrote:
$ echo hello | busybox sed 's/l*/@/g'
@he@o
$ echo hello | sed 's/l*/@/g'
@h@e@o@
The latter is of course correct. My naive diagnosis is that Busybox
sed's 'g' option has an off-by-one error in its next-match search,
i.e.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Tomasz Czapiewski xe...@irc.pl wrote:
Looks like the problem was caused by this commit:
7449e18190b8ed07a7cd1711b40885ae4b97efb4
('getty,login: tighten up handling of ctty, pgrp, and tty attr restoring on
timeout')
Tested on x86_64 and mipsel.
You reverted
Hi,
I didn't look into other GIT branches but noticed with busybox-1.19.3
release announcement missing tags in [1].
Last I see is 1_19_0 and 1_19_1.
Furthermore, on [1] there are no v1.19.2 and v1.19.3 tarballs listed
for download.
I know there is [2].
Just FYI.
- Sedat -
[1]
18 matches
Mail list logo
