>I fought through the bash startup scripts almost 20 years ago in
>college, and still have "source .bashrc" in my ~/.bash_profile that >I've
>been carrying from system to system ever since :-)
>and my PATH has never had '.' in it. Your explanation makes
>perfect sense though.
My understanding
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Cathey, Jim wrote:
> My understanding, from years past, is that "source " (or ". ")
> is _exactly_ the same as "", except that it's running in _this_ shell
> rather than in a subshell. Thus it is able to affect environment variables
> that
My understanding, from years past, is that "source " (or ". ") is
_exactly_ the same as "", except that it's running in _this_ shell rather
than in a subshell. Thus it is able to affect environment variables that
subsequent commands can inherit, etc.
If "." is not in your PATH, and you want