Re: [PATCH 1/1] wget: make --no-check-certificate option appear in usage

2018-06-09 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 2:44 AM, Kang-Che Sung wrote: > On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 1:46 AM, James Byrne > wrote: >> The line for this option was missing the 'usage:' prefix, meaning that >> it was ignored. >> >> Signed-off-by: James Byrne >> --- > > Well, actually wget in BusyBox does not yet check

Re: [PATCH 1/1] wget: make --no-check-certificate option appear in usage

2018-06-08 Thread Kang-Che Sung
On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 1:46 AM, James Byrne wrote: > The line for this option was missing the 'usage:' prefix, meaning that > it was ignored. > > Signed-off-by: James Byrne > --- Well, actually wget in BusyBox does not yet check for certificates, so adding the help text would be redundant and

Re: [PATCH 1/1] wget: make --no-check-certificate option appear in usage

2018-06-08 Thread James Byrne
Hi Rafał, On 08/06/18 20:26, Rafał Miłecki wrote: This footer rather shouldn't be there. Various open source project were rejecting patches because of such texts. Yes, I know, it's a source of some annoyance to me too, but this is inserted by the outgoing SMTP server and I have no control

Re: [PATCH 1/1] wget: make --no-check-certificate option appear in usage

2018-06-08 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 at 19:47, James Byrne wrote: > The line for this option was missing the 'usage:' prefix, meaning that > it was ignored. > > Signed-off-by: James Byrne > (...) > > The contents of this email and any attachment are confidential to the > intended recipient(s). If you are not an

[PATCH 1/1] wget: make --no-check-certificate option appear in usage

2018-06-08 Thread James Byrne
The line for this option was missing the 'usage:' prefix, meaning that it was ignored. Signed-off-by: James Byrne --- networking/wget.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/networking/wget.c b/networking/wget.c index 8103aac..b36c14a 100644 --- a/networking/wget.c