Re: [PATCH 3/3] unzip: add support for a non-standard (busybox only) -J NUM option

2017-11-09 Thread Eugene Rudoy
Hi Denys, On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > I'm wary of adding incompatible extensions. That's the reason I made it optional. It's a quite straightforward change and I was hoping it could be possible to maintain it upstream. If no I'm perfectly fine with maintaining the chan

Re: [PATCH 3/3] unzip: add support for a non-standard (busybox only) -J NUM option

2017-11-09 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Eugene Rudoy wrote: > Its behavior is the same as that of tar's --strip-components=NUM. > > Based on > https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit?id=6c563e370d0f2f3cf36f3b274e8fe1392ca7125f > > function old new delta >

[PATCH 3/3] unzip: add support for a non-standard (busybox only) -J NUM option

2017-11-06 Thread Eugene Rudoy
Its behavior is the same as that of tar's --strip-components=NUM. Based on https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit?id=6c563e370d0f2f3cf36f3b274e8fe1392ca7125f function old new delta unzip_main 29643088