Hey, I see, my BusyBox is too old. Checked with the following versions:
BusyBox v1.27.1 (2017-08-01 15:16:09 CEST) multi-call binary. Mem: 2963500K used, 1549724K free, 28860K shrd, 229968K buff, 1436756K cached -> correct BusyBox v1.22.1 (Ubuntu 1:1.22.0-15ubuntu1) multi-call binary. Mem: 2964068K used, 1549156K free, 0K shrd, 8955160K buff, 139988491015484K cac -> not correct Thank you, Fynn ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 07:44:55 +0000 From: Klaa?en, Fynn (LAWO) <fynn.klaas...@lawo.com> To: "busybox@busybox.net" <busybox@busybox.net> Subject: BusyBox top buffered and the cached memory Message-ID: <db5pr09mb01019304b334ee316099f1709d...@db5pr09mb0101.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Hey! I guess, there is a trivial bug when using busybox top: BusyBox v1.22.1 (Ubuntu 1:1.22.0-15ubuntu1) multi-call binary: Mem: 3278296K used, 1236784K free, 0K shrd, 35373432K buff, 140001458828604K cached ?or? BusyBox v1.22.1: Mem: 559252K used, 1413876K free, 0K shrd, 160503248K buff, 160503296K cached The size oft the buffered and the cached memory seems a bit large and probably has the wrong unit. Best regards, Fynn -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20170801/934d2006/attachment-0001.html> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 16:07:23 +0800 From: Kang-Che Sung <explore...@gmail.com> To: Klaa?en, Fynn (LAWO) <fynn.klaas...@lawo.com> Cc: "busybox@busybox.net" <busybox@busybox.net> Subject: Re: BusyBox top buffered and the cached memory Message-ID: <caddzafo8vd+w6bi_hnagcaws6jxezqtcrcqug7tsefx4gks...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Klaa?en, Fynn (LAWO) <fynn.klaas...@lawo.com> wrote: > > I guess, there is a trivial bug when using busybox top: > > BusyBox v1.22.1 (Ubuntu 1:1.22.0-15ubuntu1) multi-call binary: > > Mem: 3278296K used, 1236784K free, 0K shrd, 35373432K buff, > 140001458828604K cached > > ?or? > > BusyBox v1.22.1: > > Mem: 559252K used, 1413876K free, 0K shrd, 160503248K buff, 160503296K > cached > > The size oft the buffered and the cached memory seems a bit large and > probably has the wrong unit. Can you reproduce it? Did you try the latest development version (git master branch)? I think you can help us more if you can deduce which commit caused the regression, or provide some other info that can help us reproduce it. ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox ------------------------------ End of busybox Digest, Vol 145, Issue 1 *************************************** _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox