Re: About the approximate applet sizes in menuconfig

2017-07-20 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Kang-Che Sung wrote: >> This would solve 2 problems. >> 1. it is clear what the base is (Kang-Che Sung point 3 is valid) >> 2. in future all claims like "save 200 Bytes (tested on MIPSxyz)" are off >> limits. >> > What do you mean by

Re: About the approximate applet sizes in menuconfig

2017-07-20 Thread Kang-Che Sung
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 8:22 PM, walter harms wrote: > > > Am 20.07.2017 12:17, schrieb Denys Vlasenko: >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Kang-Che Sung wrote: >>> (https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=4eed2c6c5092ed95b8ee6d994106c54a9fc6ed3e) >>> >>>

Re: About the approximate applet sizes in menuconfig

2017-07-20 Thread walter harms
Am 20.07.2017 12:17, schrieb Denys Vlasenko: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Kang-Che Sung wrote: >> (https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=4eed2c6c5092ed95b8ee6d994106c54a9fc6ed3e) >> >> I don't like this. I don't like these size info to be put on the titles >> of

Re: About the approximate applet sizes in menuconfig

2017-07-20 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Kang-Che Sung wrote: > (https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=4eed2c6c5092ed95b8ee6d994106c54a9fc6ed3e) > > I don't like this. I don't like these size info to be put on the titles > of config options. A few reasons: > * It can give a

About the approximate applet sizes in menuconfig

2017-07-19 Thread Kang-Che Sung
(https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=4eed2c6c5092ed95b8ee6d994106c54a9fc6ed3e) I don't like this. I don't like these size info to be put on the titles of config options. A few reasons: * It can give a false impression that the size of the final busybox binary is the size of these applets