On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Kang-Che Sung wrote:
>> This would solve 2 problems.
>> 1. it is clear what the base is (Kang-Che Sung point 3 is valid)
>> 2. in future all claims like "save 200 Bytes (tested on MIPSxyz)" are off
>> limits.
>>
> What do you mean by
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 8:22 PM, walter harms wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.07.2017 12:17, schrieb Denys Vlasenko:
>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Kang-Che Sung wrote:
>>> (https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=4eed2c6c5092ed95b8ee6d994106c54a9fc6ed3e)
>>>
>>>
Am 20.07.2017 12:17, schrieb Denys Vlasenko:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Kang-Che Sung wrote:
>> (https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=4eed2c6c5092ed95b8ee6d994106c54a9fc6ed3e)
>>
>> I don't like this. I don't like these size info to be put on the titles
>> of
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Kang-Che Sung wrote:
> (https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=4eed2c6c5092ed95b8ee6d994106c54a9fc6ed3e)
>
> I don't like this. I don't like these size info to be put on the titles
> of config options. A few reasons:
> * It can give a
(https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=4eed2c6c5092ed95b8ee6d994106c54a9fc6ed3e)
I don't like this. I don't like these size info to be put on the titles
of config options. A few reasons:
* It can give a false impression that the size of the final busybox
binary is the size of these applets