-boun...@busybox.net] On
Behalf Of Tanguy Pruvot
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:45 AM
To: Laszlo Papp
Cc: wald...@gmx.de; busybox
Subject: Re: Re: Re: missing format string in applets/usage_pod.c
its the same with bionic libc (arm)
printf(test) is ok but not printf(buf) with char buf[] = test
, 2014 6:45 AM
*To:* Laszlo Papp
*Cc:* wald...@gmx.de; busybox
*Subject:* Re: Re: Re: missing format string in applets/usage_pod.c
its the same with bionic libc (arm)
printf(test) is ok but not printf(buf) with char buf[] = test;
printf(%s, buf) is ok
2014-08-14 15:29 GMT+02:00
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 04:15:50PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 03:28:51PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Tanguy Pruvot tanguy.pru...@gmail.com
wrote:
its the same
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:58:56PM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 04:15:50PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 03:28:51PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:44 PM,
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:58:56PM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 04:15:50PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 06:39:39PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:58:56PM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 04:15:50PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:05 PM,
Sorry, the list was left out at some point due to my mistake ... See below.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:04 PM, wald...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Laszlo,
Cannot reproduce with -Wall -Wpedantic -Wextra.
Did you notice:
its the same with bionic libc (arm)
printf(test) is ok but not printf(buf) with char buf[] = test;
printf(%s, buf) is ok
2014-08-14 15:29 GMT+02:00 Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org:
Sorry, the list was left out at some point due to my mistake ... See below.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Laszlo
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Tanguy Pruvot tanguy.pru...@gmail.com
wrote:
its the same with bionic libc (arm)
printf(test) is ok but not printf(buf) with char buf[] = test;
printf(%s, buf) is ok
Yeah, I guess it is about personal preference. I personally do not like the
extended code
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:36 PM, wald...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Laszlo,
Yeah, I guess it is about personal preference. I personally do not like
the
extended code just to make some smart option silent. ...
Based on your arguing it seems that you have NEVER heard about
format string exploits
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 03:28:51PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Tanguy Pruvot tanguy.pru...@gmail.com
wrote:
its the same with bionic libc (arm)
printf(test) is ok but not printf(buf) with char buf[] = test;
printf(%s, buf) is ok
Yeah, I guess it is
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 03:28:51PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Tanguy Pruvot tanguy.pru...@gmail.com
wrote:
its the same with bionic libc (arm)
printf(test) is ok but not printf(buf)
Here is my benchmark just to show I am not speaking out of an imaginary
world:
#include stdio.h
int main()
{
const char *buff = foo;
int i = 0;
for (i; i 100; ++i)
// fputs(buff, stdout);
printf(%s, buff);
return 0;
}
Fputs:
real0m1.761s
user
13 matches
Mail list logo
