On Sunday 27 February 2011 06:20, Harald Becker wrote:
> Hallo Denys!
>
> > Can you prepare a patch to include/applets.src.h?
> > An alias is easily created in this file using APPLET_ODDNAME macro.
>
> As things changed so much I wasn't sure where to put this currently. It
> seems one change has
Hallo Denys!
> Can you prepare a patch to include/applets.src.h?
> An alias is easily created in this file using APPLET_ODDNAME macro.
As things changed so much I wasn't sure where to put this currently. It
seems one change has to go in applets.src.h and one anywhere in an
applet source file, th
On Thursday 24 February 2011 16:17, Harald Becker wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since the beginnings of bzip2 it was always possible to set symlinks to
> allow the usage of bzip2 with it's old name bzip. So I do have several
> shell scripts which use bzip/bunzip. The problem is, that the busybox
> applets do
Hi!
>
> Isn't it easier to have two shell scripts bzip:
>
> #!/bin/sh -
> exec bzip2 "$@"
>
> and bunzip:
>
> #!/bin/sh -
> exec bunzip2 "$@"
>
> Hope this helps,
True, I do have those scripts, but I havily rely on the standalone
feature of busybox, that is, scripts do not call any external progr
2011/2/24 Harald Becker :
> Hi!
>
> Since the beginnings of bzip2 it was always possible to set symlinks to
> allow the usage of bzip2 with it's old name bzip. So I do have several
> shell scripts which use bzip/bunzip. The problem is, that the busybox
> applets do not allow such usage. That let t
Hi!
Since the beginnings of bzip2 it was always possible to set symlinks to
allow the usage of bzip2 with it's old name bzip. So I do have several
shell scripts which use bzip/bunzip. The problem is, that the busybox
applets do not allow such usage. That let to the fact, that I do always
have to
