On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Jody Bruchon wrote:
> On 3/18/2014 10:51 AM, Jody Bruchon wrote:
>>
>> Out of an interest in seeing this feature, I'm looking at vi.c
>
>
> I've started implementing the "undo" function; it looks to be easier than I
> expected now that I have a feel for the way the
On 3/18/2014 10:51 AM, Jody Bruchon wrote:
Out of an interest in seeing this feature, I'm looking at vi.c
I've started implementing the "undo" function; it looks to be easier
than I expected now that I have a feel for the way the buffer is handled
and should add very little actual code (thoug
I haven't worked with the code, but to me, it looks like:
1. it's stuffing a pointer to the first index into the passed in array into
q
2. it's replacing any newlines in the string with nulls
3. it's calling a colon() function to execute the command mode command
associated with the string that was
On 3/18/2014 9:24 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Hi,
do you plan to implement this feature any soon? It would be really
useful. Currently, it is a bit difficult to do undo in certain
scenarios when editing files on the embedded board.
Out of an interest in seeing this feature, I'm looking at vi.c and
By the way, I sent it a few months ago to the mailing list, but it has
not arrived. Any reason for that? I also tried to contact the mailing
list owner, but have never received any replies. :-(
It would be nice to avoid this in the future, so it would be nice to
know the reason. Nothing has change
Hi,
do you plan to implement this feature any soon? It would be really
useful. Currently, it is a bit difficult to do undo in certain
scenarios when editing files on the embedded board.
Cheers, L.
___
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://list
