Re: busybox 1.6.1 miscutils/taskset problem with glibc, wrong number of params

2007-09-14 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 13 September 2007, Paul Barrette wrote: This toolchain was made by tool call ltib from bitshrine.org. Changing the toolchain mid project is not an option for us. Probably before the next I will. then you'll have to change the code locally ... this isnt a bug in busybox -mike

Re: busybox 1.6.1 miscutils/taskset problem with glibc, wrong number of params

2007-09-13 Thread Paul Barrette
This toolchain was made by tool call ltib from bitshrine.org. Changing the toolchain mid project is not an option for us. Probably before the next I will. thanks, Pb Brian Austin wrote: did you make that toolchain yourself? I would suggest using a 4.x with a 2.3.4 of higher c library

busybox 1.6.1 miscutils/taskset problem with glibc, wrong number of params

2007-09-12 Thread Paul Barrette
Glibc's sched_setaffinity only has two args extern int sched_setaffinity (__pid_t __pid, __const cpu_set_t *__mask) While uclibc has 3. CC miscutils/taskset.o miscutils/taskset.c: In function `taskset_main': miscutils/taskset.c:78: warning: passing arg 2 of `sched_getaffinity' makes

busybox 1.6.1 miscutils/taskset problem with glibc, wrong number of params

2007-09-12 Thread Ralf Friedl
Glibc's sched_setaffinity only has two args extern int sched_setaffinity (__pid_t __pid, __const cpu_set_t *__mask) While uclibc has 3. My glibc-2.3.4 and glibc-2.4 both have three args (pid, cpusetsize, mask) ___ busybox mailing list

Re: busybox 1.6.1 miscutils/taskset problem with glibc, wrong number of params

2007-09-12 Thread Brian Austin
what version are you using? the newer ones have 3 I believe. But I'm not exactly sure since we use uClibc mostly On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 10:21 -0400, Paul Barrette wrote: Glibc's sched_setaffinity only has two args extern int sched_setaffinity (__pid_t __pid, __const cpu_set_t *__mask)

Re: busybox 1.6.1 miscutils/taskset problem with glibc, wrong number of params

2007-09-12 Thread Paul Barrette
Update busybox or my toolchain? I don't plan on updating my toolchain, this one is sanitized and a lot depends on it. Besides, it is not a problem with the toolchain. Pb Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:07:40AM -0400, Paul Barrette wrote: I am using:

Re: busybox 1.6.1 miscutils/taskset problem with glibc, wrong number of params

2007-09-12 Thread Brian Austin
did you make that toolchain yourself? I would suggest using a 4.x with a 2.3.4 of higher c library On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 12:09 -0400, Paul Barrette wrote: Update busybox or my toolchain? I don't plan on updating my toolchain, this one is sanitized and a lot depends on it. Besides, it is