On Mit, 2012-06-20 at 10:36 -0700, George Pontis wrote:
I have an application that runs well using lighttpd with PHP. In an effort
to reduce the memory footprint I tried porting it to the busybox ( 1.20.1 )
httpd. It was easy to get this working and it seems to work properly. What
isn't good
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch
be...@petrovitsch.priv.at wrote:
embedded environment. By comparison, lighttpd starts a programmable number
of php-cgi processes at startup, then keeps them around and just feeds
scripts to them as needed. It is feasible to go back to lighttpd
On 6/21/2012 8:39 AM, Gary Altenberg wrote:
On 6/21/2012 5:01 AM, Laurent Bercot wrote:
There might also be some downsides to repeated alloc/free in the
embedded environment.
Not at all. As long as you have enough memory to serve the
requests, and
dynamic allocations are kept to a
On 6/21/2012 6:01 AM, Laurent Bercot wrote:
I have an application that runs well using lighttpd with PHP. In an effort
to reduce the memory footprint I tried porting it to the busybox ( 1.20.1 )
httpd. It was easy to get this working and it seems to work properly. What
isn't good enough is
I have an application that runs well using lighttpd with PHP. In an effort
to reduce the memory footprint I tried porting it to the busybox ( 1.20.1 )
httpd. It was easy to get this working and it seems to work properly. What
isn't good enough is performance when executing PHP scripts. It looks
