I agree that this should be done after the release.
Regarding logging: I am fine with JUL. I don't really care too much
about that topic these days,
hence I am fine with SLF4J, but I think I'd prefer JUL over it :-)
-Matthias
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Roman Stumm roman.st...@gmx.de
Those discussions are really an all time classic ;)
Imo most new frameworks now usually use jul Logger directly or with an own self
written convenience wrapper. jul has improved a lot over the first version and
now is pretty much usable. It's still not the best logging framework around
from
I've created a 0.1-incubating release candidate, with artifacts that
need to be reviewed located at:
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-016/
Source tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.1-incubating/
Source release:
Discussion thread for vote.
What we're really voting on, is the source zip -
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-016/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.1-incubating/bval-parent-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip
For more information on the release process, checkout -
