+1 On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > +1 > > > md5sum bval-parent-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip.asc OK > > sha1sum bval-parent-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip.asc OK > > > gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key gpg D018E6B1 OK > gpg bval-parent-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip.asc >> gpg: Unterschrift vom Mi 26 Mai 2010 18:11:11 CEST mittels RSA-Schlüssel ID >> D018E6B1 >> gpg: Korrekte Unterschrift von "Donald Ray Woods (Apache code signing key) >> <dwo...@apache.org>" >> gpg: WARNUNG: Dieser Schlüssel trägt keine vertrauenswürdige Signatur! >> gpg: Es gibt keinen Hinweis, daß die Signatur wirklich dem >> vorgeblichen Besitzer gehört. >> Haupt-Fingerabdruck = 4982 03CD 9F85 74C5 E8E1 19D9 F8E9 B8C5 D018 E6B1 > > Is this your Key Donald? then OK > > mvn clean rat:check OK > > mvn clean install OK > > cd bval-tck > mvn clean install -Ptck OK > > svn tag looks good too OK > > > So far the release looks pretty well. > I'll try it in my real world app tonight. > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- On Wed, 5/26/10, Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org> wrote: > >> From: Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org> >> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Bean Validation 0.1-incubating Release Candidate #2 >> To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Date: Wednesday, May 26, 2010, 4:54 PM >> I've created a 0.1-incubating release >> candidate #2, with the following >> artifacts up for a vote: >> >> SVN source tag (r948483): >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.1-incubating/ >> >> Maven staging repo: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-020/ >> >> Source release: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-020/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.1-incubating/bval-parent-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip >> >> Javadoc staging site: >> http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.1-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/ >> >> PGP release keys: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS >> >> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> >> Thanks, >> Donald >> > > > >
-- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
