I agree that this should be done after the release.
Regarding logging: I am fine with JUL. I don't really care too much
about that topic these days,
hence I am fine with SLF4J, but I think I'd prefer JUL over it :-)
-Matthias
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Roman Stumm roman.st...@gmx.de
Subject: Re: Build suggestions
To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Monday, May 24, 2010, 7:02 PM
hi carlos,
over the years we had a lot of discussions. you found the
last discussion we
had (which is also the one with my initial slf4j
suggestion).
regards,
gerhard
http
I'm working on cleaning up the build (BVAL-58). Here are a few things I
suggest changing -- these will be in at least one version of my patch -- and
some questions.
1. It seems pretty standard nowadays to name bundles such as apache-bval by
their package name, so it would be
3. Is anyone interested in using slf4j instead of commons-logging?
I am. At the moment I'm using a config similar to the one described here:
http://blog.springsource.com/2009/12/04/logging-dependencies-in-spring/ ,
which adds a bit of complexity in the pom but works fine.
However, if dropping
+1 for SLF4J.
a no to JUL, but anyway: after the 0.1 release, please. I think there
are more important things to be done, which are even more interesting...
On 5/24/2010 8:33 PM, Carlos Vara wrote:
Hi Gerhard,
I think I located the thread in MyFaces mailing list, I will link it
here for
