Re: [BVARC] Coax cable question

IO CLUB" <bvarc@bvarc.org> Cc: "SETX Telecom" <setxtele...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 6:04:57 PM Subject: Re: [BVARC] Coax cable question I would not use 8X for any feedline..not bad for a double bazooka antenna though lol I prefer Heliax myself...

Re: [BVARC] Coax cable question

I would not use 8X for any feedline..not bad for a double bazooka antenna though lol I prefer Heliax myself...the superflex type is great for a lot of things..and can bend a lot better than regular Heliax...with better loss than LMR and no shield movement noise ..which really is a pain in

Re: [BVARC] Coax cable question

smartphone Original message From: Gayle Dotts via BVARC <bvarc@bvarc.org> Date: 8/9/17 4:23 PM (GMT-06:00) To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <bvarc@bvarc.org> Cc: Gayle Dotts <gayle.do...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [BVARC] Coax cable question So bo

Re: [BVARC] Coax cable question

So bottom line. yes! For a little bit more in financial expense on the LMR400 cable from RG8x you will noticeably benefit in increased receiving ability as well as transmiting from the upgrade. thanks. On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Gayle Dotts wrote: > For use in

Re: [BVARC] Coax cable question

I use LMR400 Ultraflex for all permanent installs (i.e., not "portable"). My rationale is, it's a capital expenditure that you only shell out for once, it's not THAT much more than cheaper options, and I can always repurpose it for just about any other application (V/U, e.g.) down the road. I

Re: [BVARC] Coax cable question

Spec says .7 db at 30 megs. Not too shabby. Worth it? Heck yes! RH Sent from my i-Thingamajig > On Aug 9, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gayle Dotts via BVARC wrote: > > For use in HF at 28.000 Mhz frequency, length 75-100 feet, is LMR400 cable > worth it for better RX/TX

Re: [BVARC] Coax cable question

Gayle: The loss of RG213 cable is only about 1 dB (10%) per 100 ft. at 30 MHz. LMR400 would only be about 1/2 that loss, so I really go with the 213 and wouldn't worry too much about it. 73s, Gary Sitton, K5AMH gasit...@comcast.net On 8/9/2017 11:55, Gayle Dotts via BVARC wrote: For use

Re: [BVARC] Coax cable question

You will have a good bit less loss with the LMR-400 feedline. Paul Noll KG5MHD Love your pets, they want and deserve it !!! > On Aug 9, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Gayle Dotts via BVARC wrote: > > For use in HF at 28.000 Mhz frequency, length 75-100 feet, is LMR400 cable > worth it

[BVARC] Coax cable question

For use in HF at 28.000 Mhz frequency, length 75-100 feet, is LMR400 cable worth it for better RX/TX attenuation? ___ BVARC mailing list BVARC@bvarc.org http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com